Home Section_sub_break Using GoToManage Section_sub_break Technical Support
Icon_discussion_forum_small g2mg_crawlers using a lot of memory
Computer; 2g ram, Windows XP SP2 I see in the process tree a lot of g2mg_crawles running and goto manage crawler. Al...
Icon_post
3
Icon_person
Digby Cunningham
Icon_time
02/05/2012 at 15:47
Reply
2 posts
Joined: 10/11/01
Empty_star Empty_star Empty_star Empty_star
Icon_time 01/07/2012 at 10:25

Computer; 2g ram, Windows XP SP2

I see in the process tree a lot of g2mg_crawles running and goto manage crawler. All together they are using 361 meg of ram. Is this common?

Thanks,
Rick

8 posts
Joined: 08/10/20
Empty_star Empty_star Empty_star Empty_star
Icon_time 01/08/2012 at 18:12

Having a few g2mg_crawler.exe processes; yes that appears normal.

But as for memory, across 3x servers I just checked the largest is 83MB, and there’s only one ‘high’ process per server … most of the threads are > 10MB each.

I would say you have a problem there. Are you scanning a large range and/or monitoring a lot of systems?

2 posts
Joined: 10/11/01
Empty_star Empty_star Empty_star Empty_star
Icon_time 01/10/2012 at 17:52

It’s a smaller network about 15 devices but only the server has the crawler running. I goofed up, it’s not running on XP, I should have said Server 2003R2.

I wanted to add an image of the process list but I’m having a problem uplaoding to this forum. When I click Add Image it pops me to the top of the web page with no way to upload the image.

8 posts
Joined: 08/10/20
Empty_star Empty_star Empty_star Empty_star
Icon_time 02/05/2012 at 15:47

I run crawlers on Server 2008/R2, Server2003, Win7Pro and WinXP Pro. Again, all much lower than yours.

Are you scanning too much perchance? Did you modify the default crawler scans? In one case I was ‘playing’ and did a FULL WMI_Plugin on a server once an hour. It led to high processor utilization once an hour and larger than normal memory footprint. It was a while ago so I can’t remember the numbers - nor am I really willing to replicate it again :D

Reply